What is the general principle regarding collateral possession in consumer cases during strict foreclosure?

In consumer cases during strict foreclosure, the general principle is that the collateral must not be in the debtor’s possession at the time of the proposal. Strict foreclosure is a process where a secured party may keep collateral in satisfaction of the debt, but certain conditions must be met to protect the rights of the debtor. If the debtor is in possession of the collateral, it raises complications regarding their rights and the ability of the creditor to reclaim the property fully.

The rationale behind this principle is to ensure that the secured party is able to take control of the collateral without interference from the debtor. If the debtor retains possession, it could lead to disputes over the value of the collateral and issues concerning the debtor’s ability to protect or damage the collateral, undermining the secured party's ability to recover their interests effectively.

Possession being outside the debtor's control serves to clarify the secured party's authority and streamline the process of foreclosure. In this context, it protects both parties by minimizing potential conflicts and providing clarity regarding the status of the collateral involved.